Leave Taylor Swift's Uterus Alone

Leave Taylor Swift's Uterus Alone

Over the past few years Taylor Swift has risen to become, apparently, the most influential celebrity in the world, and this is a great benchmark for me to use to finally admit that I am old, because Taylor Swift marks the first time in my life that the most influential celebrity in the world is somebody I know absolutely nothing about.

I’ve never knowingly heard a Taylor Swift song, although I’ve most likely heard one incidentally if she really is that ubiquitous, maybe in a shopping centre or movie soundtrack. That’s not a humble brag, it’s not any kind of brag, I just don’t listen to new pop music. If you ask me about Taylor Swift there are only three things I can tell you off the top of my head: She’s dating a popular football player who I also know nothing about; People make fun of how often she flies in her private jet; But more than anything, she’s a frequent target of criticism for the toxic influence she has on young girls as a role model, with specific regard to her sexuality.

You would think the main concern would be the fact that she’s always photographed farting into a microphone

As silly as it seems that Tay-Tay would be the one on the receiving end of all this criticism while people like Drake and Kendrick Lamar are engaging in rap feuds over whether or to what extent each other is a violent sexual predator, the offense Swift is charged with is being in her 30s and still yet to reproduce even once.

Far be it for me to spend too much of my emotional budget worrying about the feelings of the richest and most powerful people on the planet, but the amount of escalating panic and associated anger being levelled at Swift about this one specific issue is baffling and gross as fuck. The most recent example in Newsweek, a worthless opinion column by John Mac Ghlionn that makes you wonder who the hell asked, is just the latest in a long line. It’s not only men who are losing their minds about this. Back in February there’s this one by Sophia Worringer entitled “If Taylor Swift cares about the future, she should get married and have kids.”

While this is pretty bum standard Country Farmers brand traditional misogyny™, it’s also more than that. I know that it’s annoying and reductive when people insist everything comes down to white nationalism, but this does come down to white nationalism, at least largely, in both its explicit and more sedate manifestations. Taylor Swift isn’t just your average white pop star. Through no fault of her own, she’s White-white in a way that gives Mike Pence hypertension. And although she’s given absolutely no indication that she has political sympathies for the 1488 Squad, the alt-right has been obsessed with her since at least 2016 during Donald Trump’s first campaign.

Who doesn’t want their overies fetishised by a 60 year old white supremacist with a skin condition?

Taylor Swift—her mystique, that is, not her actual politic—sits at the heart of a venn diagram that intersects the alt-right, white ethnonationalists, traditionalist conservatives, and the pronatalist movement. Again, none of this is due to anything that she has said. Politically, she’s a standard liberal, on the very rare occasion that she mentions politics at all. But the fact that her actual views can be so readily written off and ignored and she can still be dismissed as apolitical or even conservative despite the fact that she’s an open Biden supporter adds fuel to my point: We don’t treat women celebrities as individual agents.

The people wringing their hands over Swift’s biological clock—with all the slow-boiling panic of a medieval court of an aging heirless monarch—aren’t necessarily all conservatives but there are patches of common ground. Above all, the world must stay familiar; progress, where it occurs, should be paced and measured; the status must always remain quo. The alarm that society is raising over Taylor Swift’s reproductive status is happening at the same time as a perceived crisis in male role models, wherein young boys are turning to human waste like Andrew Tate for mentorship.

Tate, a proud misogynist anti-intellectual human slaver who trapped women into porn factories, is praised by many in the same far-right sphere of influence that yearns to subdue Taylor Swift, from Charlie Kirk to Nigel Farage. On the other side of the political spectrum, liberal boys’ and men’s advocates are struggling to counter his messaging with more wholesome visions of positive masculinity while the MAGA crowd scoff and call them soycucks. In either case, there’s a distinction between the moral panics we have about our male and female role models.

(I’m not making any particular point by putting this picture here except that I erased Andrew Tate’s face and literally could not stop giggling at it for 10 minutes because he’s just a finger)

When it comes to the culture and the role models that we expose boys to, we worry over how it’s developing their growth into men. Depending on your opinion of Andrew Tate, you either approve of the thought of a generation of boys growing up to be Just Like Him or you desperately abhor it. When I worked for Cracked we used to write these pieces occasionally about famous men, the lede essentially being that they’re secretly just these really great guys, and I didn’t realise at the time that what we were doing, probably unconsciously, was advertising positive masculinity to our audience. We want our sons to carry our legacy, yes, and become good leaders for our communities, but we also want their lives to have meaning for themselves and not become victim to some toxic ideology or another. We want them to carry pride in themselves.

And we were liberals and we were feminists, and we would never write an article like this about famous women. It was an actual policy, I remember one of the higher editors explaining that the reason we wouldn’t write an article about badass women was because the hook of such an article would be “they’re badass even though they’re women.” The concern was with how out of touch and icky that was.

And they weren’t wrong. But when our media does write about women as role models, it isn’t about how they’re teaching our daughters values and skills that will help them develop as fulfilled and well rounded women. It’s about how well they’re persuading a generation of girls to help reach societal population goals.


The Ghost version of this newsletter is for paid subscribers only. Sign up to get it right now ⬇️

A completely free version is also available. To read for free, visit or sign up at Substack